Case in Point 2: Redistribution of Wealth

Upon Presdident Obama's statement that he would rather be a really good one term President and whether it is his job to "get re-elected" again we review language that was completely available prior to his election. Our President is simply doing what he said he was going to do. If we, as the American electorate missed this, it had to have been out of willful neglect. Here then Senator Obama chastise the Warren (Supreme) court and the civil rights movement for not "venturing" into a re-distribution of wealth, "not going far enough" and for not being "that radical". We also are told that his "bias" would hold that re-distribution would take place at the legislative level. We also see the widely distributed exchange with "Joe the Plumber".



Folks we are getting what we paid for. There is no reason to rip on President Obama for governing according to his convictions. Isn't this what we would want from a President? To run according to his convictions and then govern according to his convictions? If you don't like it, change it.

Value and wealth - SELF QUOTE

Value is not a measure of wealth, but a measure of contribution. 

Value and wealth - SELF QUOTE

"America was never intended to provide an equality of wealth...it was intended to provide a wealth of equality."